SAE Technical Paper Series 2003
DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-1622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Automotive Disc Brake Squeal Part III Test and Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the necessary number of tests to classify the brake in such manner is extensive, e.g. [4]. The situation becomes more complicated by the fact that there is a possibility for squealing to sometimes occur and sometimes not even during the tests with the identical operation parameters [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the necessary number of tests to classify the brake in such manner is extensive, e.g. [4]. The situation becomes more complicated by the fact that there is a possibility for squealing to sometimes occur and sometimes not even during the tests with the identical operation parameters [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By looking at those results, it can be said that variations in contact pressure distributions are due to brake pad surface topography. This, in turn could also explain the variations in static contact pressure distributions found in [6].…”
Section: Configurations Of Brake Padmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There has not been much research on the variation of contact pressure distribution for different pairs of pads. In a recent review, Chen et al [6] showed that there appeared noticeable variations in static contact pressure distribution between two new sets of pads, even though the pads have the same specifications and were tested with the same brake system under the same pressure. The reason for these variations was not given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used dry friction model is undoubtedly Coulomb's friction law. However, in recent decades dry friction is recognised to be of stochastic nature from both theoretical [19] and experimental [20,21] aspects. It is indeed too ideal to treat the coefficient of friction (COF) as an invariant quantity as the contacting objects are generally surrounded by complicated conditions (e.g., contacting surfaces' roughness, contact forces between the objects, and the interfacial temperature).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%