DOI: 10.2969/aspm/07510207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On automorphism groups of affine surfaces

Abstract: This is a survey on the automorphism groups in various classes of affine algebraic surfaces and the algebraic group actions on such surfaces. Being infinite-dimensional, these automorphism groups share some important features of algebraic groups. At the same time, they can be studied from the viewpoint of the combinatorial group theory, so we put a special accent on group-theoretical aspects (ind-groups, amalgams, etc.). We provide different approaches to classification, prove certain new results, and attract … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of an ind-group goes back to Shafarevich who called these objects infinite dimensional groups (see [13]). We refer to [4] and [7,Section 2] for basic notions in this context. Definition 2.1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notion of an ind-group goes back to Shafarevich who called these objects infinite dimensional groups (see [13]). We refer to [4] and [7,Section 2] for basic notions in this context. Definition 2.1.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] and [9] the neutral component Aut • (X) of the group of automorphisms Aut(X) of an affine surface X has been studied. Note that Aut • (X) is a closed subgroup of Aut(X).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark Using different techniques, it is proved in [, Proposition 4.4] that if the neutral component of the automorphism group of a rigid affine surface is an affine algebraic group, then this component is a torus. Let us notice that surfaces of class (ML2) in terminology of are precisely rigid surfaces in our terms.…”
Section: Subtori In the Automorphism Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next proposition can be deduced from Theorems 6.3 and 8.24 in [12] and their corollaries. However, in our particular case we prefer to give a simple direct argument.…”
Section: On Moduli Spaces Of Gdf Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The first equation in (9) gives (12). This means that U j+1 → U j is an isomorphism commuting with the projections to…”
Section: Gdf Surfaces Whose Fiber Trees Are Bushesmentioning
confidence: 99%