The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2009
DOI: 10.1080/00036810902913847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On asymptotic stability and instability with respect to a fading stochastic perturbation

Abstract: We develop necessary and sufficient conditions for the a.s. asymptotic stability of solutions of a scalar, non-linear stochastic equation with state-independent stochastic perturbations that fade in intensity. These conditions are formulated in terms of the intensity function: roughly speaking, we show that as long as the perturbations fade quicker than some identifiable critical rate, the stability of the underlying deterministic equation is unaffected. These results improve on those of Chan and Williams; for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lipschitz continuity of f , the property (1.4), (4.5), and the fact that g is continuous on [0, ∞) and g(t) → 0 as t → ∞ means, by a result in [7], that z(t) → 0 as t → ∞. This allows us to conclude that x(t) → 0 as t → ∞, as claimed.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The Lipschitz continuity of f , the property (1.4), (4.5), and the fact that g is continuous on [0, ∞) and g(t) → 0 as t → ∞ means, by a result in [7], that z(t) → 0 as t → ∞. This allows us to conclude that x(t) → 0 as t → ∞, as claimed.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Suppose that f obeys (2.2), g obeys (2. 3), and that f obeys (2.22) and g and f obey (2.25). Suppose that x is the unique continuous solution of (2.1).…”
Section: Precise Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the case when g obeys (2.8) but g ∈ L 1 (0, ∞) and when f obeys (2.2) but the restoring force f (x) as x → ∞ is so weak that lim x→∞ f (x) = 0 (2.11) are presented in Appleby, Gleeson and Rodkina [3]. However, when (2.11) is strengthened so that in addition to (2.2), f also obeys There exists φ > 0 such that φ := lim inf |x|→∞ |f (x)|, (2.12) then the condition (2.8) on g suffices to ensure that the solution x of (2.1) obeys (2.6).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations