On association-analysis and the classification of plant communities

Coetzee, Ben; Werger, M. J. A.

doi:10.1007/bf02389709

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Association Analysis and Related Methods1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1977

1990

Publication Types

Select...

Book5

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent7

Authors

Journals

Cited by 18 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Groups obtained in monothetic methods are less homogeneous than groups resulting from polythetic methods, because in the latter case more than one character determines the division. Therefore if a polythetic method is available it should always be preferred over a monothetic one (Coetzee & Werger 1975;Hill et al 1975). …”

Section: Association Analysis and Related Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology.

Green¹,

Jongman²,

Braak³

et al. 1990

Biometrics

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Association Analysis and Related Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology.

Green¹,

Jongman²,

Braak³

et al. 1990

Biometrics

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We refer, for instance, to contributions by Gittins (1965), , Williams et al (1966), Orl6ci (1966), Webb et al (1967), Ivimey Cook & Proctor (1967), van der Maarel (1969)7 Moore et al (1970), Harrison (1970), Grigal & Goldstein (1971), Singh & West (1971), Goldsmith (1973), Coetzee & Werger (1975), Adam et al (1975) among others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%