2009
DOI: 10.5666/kmj.2009.49.1.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Approximation by Post-Widder and Stancu Operators Preserving x2

Abstract: In the papers [5]-[7] was examined approximation of functions by the modified Szász-Mrakyan operators and other positive linear operators preserving e2(x) = x 2. In this paper we introduce the Post-Widder and Stancu operators preserving x 2 in polynomial weighted spaces. We show that these operators have better approximation properties than classical Post-Widder and Stancu operators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post Widder and Stancu operators are instead object of a modification that preserves 2 in polynomial weighted spaces, proposed by Rempulska and Skorupka in [12]. Also in this case better approximation properties than the original operators are achieved.…”
Section: A Brief Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post Widder and Stancu operators are instead object of a modification that preserves 2 in polynomial weighted spaces, proposed by Rempulska and Skorupka in [12]. Also in this case better approximation properties than the original operators are achieved.…”
Section: A Brief Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denoting e i (x) = x i , i = 0,1,2, according to [2], Chapter 9 (see, also [8]) we have Remark 1.1. In the paper [1] (see also [9], pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it has been shown in [2] that the operators defined by * ( ; ) := ( ; V ( )) (6) do not preserve the test functions 1 ( ) = and 2 ( ) = 2 but provide the best error estimation among all the Szász-Mirakjan operators for all ∈ ([0, ∞)) and for each ∈ [1/2, ∞). For the other linear positive operator families which preserve 2 ( ) = 2 , we refer [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. On the other hand, in [10,11] the authors considered some operators preserving 1 ( ) = .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%