Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-57155-8_267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On approximating the longest path in a graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
99
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
99
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…· n · m) where n and m are respectively the number of vertices and the number of edges of the graph. Karger, Motwani and Ramkumar [8] gave a polynomial time algorithm which finds a path of length Ω(log n) in any 1-tough graph. A similar result was obtained also by Fürer and Raghavachari [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…· n · m) where n and m are respectively the number of vertices and the number of edges of the graph. Karger, Motwani and Ramkumar [8] gave a polynomial time algorithm which finds a path of length Ω(log n) in any 1-tough graph. A similar result was obtained also by Fürer and Raghavachari [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the negative side, Karger, Motwani and Ramkumar [8] have proved that unless P =N P , Longest Path is not constant approximable in polynomial time. Their proof consists of two parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, finding a longest path seems to be more difficult than deciding whether or not a graph admits a Hamiltonian path. Indeed, it has been proved that even if a graph has a Hamiltonian path, the problem of finding a path of length n − n ε for any ε < 1 is NP-hard, where n is the number of vertices of the graph [15]. Moreover, there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for the longest path problem unless P=NP [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the two problems are similar, finding a longest path in a graph seems to be more difficult than deciding whether or not the graph admits a Hamiltonian path. Indeed, it has been proved that even if a graph has a Hamiltonian path, the problem of finding a path of length n − n ε for any ε < 1 is NP-hard, where n is the number of vertices of the graph [17]. Moreover, there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for the longest path problem unless P = NP [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been proved that even if a graph has a Hamiltonian path, the problem of finding a path of length n − n ε for any ε < 1 is NP-hard, where n is the number of vertices of the graph [17]. Moreover, there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for the longest path problem unless P = NP [17]. For related results see also [9-11, 25, 26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%