Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Machine Vision (GraphiCon 2020). Part 2 2020
DOI: 10.51130/graphicon-2020-2-3-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Applying of Generalized Computational Experiment to Numerical Methods Verification

Abstract: This work is devoted to the application of a generalized computational experiment for a comparative assessment of numerical methods accuracy. A generalized computational experiment allows one to obtain a numerical solution for a class of problems determined by the ranges of defining parameters variation. The approaches to the application of a generalized computational experiment in the presence of a reference solution and in its absence are dis-cussed. An example of constructing error surfaces is given when th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximating the required surface by a polynomial of the second order using the least squares method, we obtain the following values for the coefficients A = 0.0007426759754917806 B = 0.0005021159520976077 C = 0.00020442857142857106 D = -0.000012584191705984598 E = -0.0000167566591422123 F = 0.0038062569399619252 For a more general comparative assessment, we will calculate the Error Index (EI), similarly to that proposed in [33]. According to [33], the Error Index (EI) is an average value for each error surface. The results for each solver in the L2 norm in accordance with Figure 9 are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Analysis and Visualization Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximating the required surface by a polynomial of the second order using the least squares method, we obtain the following values for the coefficients A = 0.0007426759754917806 B = 0.0005021159520976077 C = 0.00020442857142857106 D = -0.000012584191705984598 E = -0.0000167566591422123 F = 0.0038062569399619252 For a more general comparative assessment, we will calculate the Error Index (EI), similarly to that proposed in [33]. According to [33], the Error Index (EI) is an average value for each error surface. The results for each solver in the L2 norm in accordance with Figure 9 are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Analysis and Visualization Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the centers of the particles satisfy the ODE system (5). We solve the differential part of the system numerically using the explicit Euler scheme:…”
Section: The Basis Of Discontinuous Particle Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, particle methods have a constructive inclination to parallelization, economical from the point of view of multidimensionality, ideologically organic to hierarchical transitions between micro-macro models of the considered phenomena. It is worth noting that the problems of evaluating the accuracy of numerical methods on discontinuities currently are very relevant [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system was tested on the real results of a generalized computational experiment on the comparative assessment of the accuracy of three solvers (Fig. 3-5) of the open software package OpenFOAM on the problem of supersonic flow around a cone at an angle of attack [20].…”
Section: Key Features and New Options Of The Multi-view Stereomaker 20 Software Packagementioning
confidence: 99%