2018
DOI: 10.1088/2399-6528/aab060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On applicability of differential mixing rules for statistically homogeneous and isotropic dispersions

Abstract: The classical differential mixing rules are assumed to be independent effective-medium approaches, applicable to certain classes of systems. In the present work, the inconsistency of differential models for macroscopically homogeneous and isotropic systems is illustrated with a model for the effective permittivity of simple dielectric systems of impenetrable balls. The analysis is carried out in terms of the compact group approach reformulated in a way that allows one to analyze the role of different contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be shown elsewhere that the CGA results for the σ eff of dispersions of hard-core-penetrable-layer particles are in very good agreement with the available simulation results [7,16,35,36]. Other applications of the CGA can be found in [43,44], where the problems of step-like electric percolation in nematic liquid crystals filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes [43] and applicability of differential mixing rules [44] are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It will be shown elsewhere that the CGA results for the σ eff of dispersions of hard-core-penetrable-layer particles are in very good agreement with the available simulation results [7,16,35,36]. Other applications of the CGA can be found in [43,44], where the problems of step-like electric percolation in nematic liquid crystals filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes [43] and applicability of differential mixing rules [44] are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%