2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2013.6544890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On answering why-not questions in reverse skyline queries

Abstract: This paper aims at answering the so called whynot questions in reverse skyline queries. A reverse skyline query retrieves all data points whose dynamic skylines contain the query point. We outline the benefit and the semantics of answering why-not questions in reverse skyline queries. In connection with this, we show how to modify the why-not point and the query point to include the why-not point in the reverse skyline of the query point. We then show, how a query point can be positioned safely anywhere within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the importance of its use in various fields of application, research in the reverse skyline has gained many attention in the database research community such as in [3], [10]- [15]. All of the proposed reverse skyline variations above only consider about reverse skyline for zero dimensional data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the importance of its use in various fields of application, research in the reverse skyline has gained many attention in the database research community such as in [3], [10]- [15]. All of the proposed reverse skyline variations above only consider about reverse skyline for zero dimensional data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 shows an illustration of window query's minimum and maximum value in one dimension. Assume min and max distance for g, q, and g are (10,15), (20,25), and (30,35). For (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), so that min(w k (g)) and max(w k (g)) are 5 (10 + (-5)) and 20 (same value as min(d k (q))).…”
Section: ) Window Querymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations