2018
DOI: 10.1017/aer.2018.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On- and off-design performance of a model rotating turbine with non-axisymmetric endwall contouring and a comparison to cascade data

Abstract: Non-axisymmetric endwalls in turbine stages have shown to be a robust method to improve the performance of turbines in both power generation and aero-derivative applications. Non-axisymmetric endwalls target the control of secondary flows and are designed using detailed computational fluid dynamics coupled with a variety of optimisation algorithms and utilising a number of objective functions according to the engine company or researcher's preference. These numerical predictions are often backed up by detailed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the NEW was extended by approximately 10% from the hub. The reduction of the C SKE is used as a measure of the effectiveness of the endwall optimization [29]. Unlike subsonic turbines, C SKE was of a conflicting nature with the performance parameter of the efficiency.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Stator Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the NEW was extended by approximately 10% from the hub. The reduction of the C SKE is used as a measure of the effectiveness of the endwall optimization [29]. Unlike subsonic turbines, C SKE was of a conflicting nature with the performance parameter of the efficiency.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Stator Hubmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was considered acceptable for the current work due to the low-speed nature of the rig, and for a full derivation of the quantity the reader is directed to Snedden et al. 2,37 In addition, and also due to the low pressure nature of the rig, the radial velocities (V3,rad 2) in equation (16) were taken to be any radial component in the flow, since the design velocity contained no radial component. Further, for both the Cske (equation (16)) and β dev (equation (18)) quantities, the off-axis flow velocity and angle were calculated using the design flow angle, which itself was calculated during the design of the blading using the NREC design suite 38 and represented as a function of the blade span ( S ).…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%