2016
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2016.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an inverse ternary Goldbach problem

Abstract: Abstract. We prove an inverse ternary Goldbach-type result. Let N be sufficiently large and c > 0 be sufficiently small. Ifcontains a composite number. This improves on the bound N 1/3+o(1) obtained in [15] using Gallagher's larger sieve. The main ingredients in our argument include a type of inverse sieve result in the larger sieve regime, and a variant of the analytic large sieve inequality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for d ≥ 3, we always have τ (d) < d. Hence it is reasonable to conjecture that Corollary 1.2 is not sharp whenever α is smaller than (and bounded away from) 1/2. See the last section in [23] for a preliminary discussion on the simplest case d = 3. Theorem 1.5 (Inverse sieve conjecture implies improved larger sieve).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for d ≥ 3, we always have τ (d) < d. Hence it is reasonable to conjecture that Corollary 1.2 is not sharp whenever α is smaller than (and bounded away from) 1/2. See the last section in [23] for a preliminary discussion on the simplest case d = 3. Theorem 1.5 (Inverse sieve conjecture implies improved larger sieve).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%