1988
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(88)90055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a question of M. Newman on the number of commutators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5], Remark 10 in the commutative case). Its proof in case of matrices over finite commutative ring is slightly more complicated:…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5], Remark 10 in the commutative case). Its proof in case of matrices over finite commutative ring is slightly more complicated:…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This argument can be generalized to semi-local rings if one is careful about the order of the elementary matrices which appear in the product. See also [6], where a more general result is proved for rings with Bass stable range at most 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We can take xX = G A n such that the first n by n block in [6] (ii) The proof is similar, using the factorization r) = ^rJA. ',^^ f rorn Lemma 9 of [4]. By decomposing r\ as V^t^V^ where the ^(^z) are upper (lower) triangular matrices, r] 6 e /"_* 0 GL k R, and rearranging these matrices, we obtain 0 = \lr^k9 2 \jf 2 , where i/r, are in B + , k is in B~, and 9 2 € h( n -k) ® O 2k R with k = asr(R) + 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%