2012
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/758/1/l20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Possible Explanation of the Long-Term Decrease in Sunspot Field Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We claim this because the determined PDF of umbral areas is consistent with previous studies, both for the whole cycle and for different portions of the solar cycle. Although Nagovitsyn, Pevtsov, and Livingston (2012) suggest that the distribution of the total sunspot areas (including penumbrae) varies with time, we find no support for changes in the umbral area PDF with time. The classification and identification of penumbra in a synoptic data set is quite complicated, as penumbrae associated with different umbrae are often merged and/or too close to each other.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…We claim this because the determined PDF of umbral areas is consistent with previous studies, both for the whole cycle and for different portions of the solar cycle. Although Nagovitsyn, Pevtsov, and Livingston (2012) suggest that the distribution of the total sunspot areas (including penumbrae) varies with time, we find no support for changes in the umbral area PDF with time. The classification and identification of penumbra in a synoptic data set is quite complicated, as penumbrae associated with different umbrae are often merged and/or too close to each other.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…A large daily variation is seen throughout the solar cycle with a tendency toward larger intensities during time of low activity, when large spots are rare or absent. The lower envelope of the data points (corresponding to the largest spot present on the Sun at any given time) shows a solar cycle shape in agreement with the results of Nagovitsyn et al (2012). A first-and second-order fit to the data is overplotted.…”
Section: Sunspot Propertiessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…BOG noted that the distribution function does not change from one cycle to the next. This is in contrast to other umbral properties such as umbral brightness (Albregtsen & Maltby 1978;Albregtsen et al 1984) or magnetic field strength Rezaei et al 2012a), which vary within the solar cycle or show a longterm trend (Nagovitsyn et al 2012). …”
Section: Temporal Invariance Of the Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%