2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a numerical subgrid upscaling algorithm for Stokes–Brinkman equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the variable sizes and geometries of these perforations, solutions to these problems have multiscale features. One solution approach involves posing the problem in a domain without perforations but with a very high contrast penalty term representing the domain heterogeneities ( [31,43,28,32]). However, the void space can be a small portion of the whole domain and, thus, it is computationally expensive to enlarge the domain substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the variable sizes and geometries of these perforations, solutions to these problems have multiscale features. One solution approach involves posing the problem in a domain without perforations but with a very high contrast penalty term representing the domain heterogeneities ( [31,43,28,32]). However, the void space can be a small portion of the whole domain and, thus, it is computationally expensive to enlarge the domain substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solved equations and numerically using Chorin's projection method (Chorin, ; Griebel et al, ) on a nonsteady state formulation (cf. Iliev et al, ) until convergence to steady state. Inside the pore‐scale domain, the hydraulic conductivity was assumed infinite resulting in the classical Stokes equations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a uniform set of equations for all domains is provided and model coupling is avoided. Still, the full parameterization of the continuum‐scale domain requires information on hydraulic properties that is frequently obtained by upscaling methods (e.g., Iliev et al, ). However, the Stokes‐Brinkman equations are not generally valid for porous media (e.g., Auriault, ) and largely depend on the choice of an effective viscosity parameter (Brinkman, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L. Guta and S. Sundar [13] presented the wave-porous structure interaction by using the Navier-Stokes-Brinkman system and applied the Finite Volume Method (FVM) to calculate the numerical results. O. Iliev et al [15] presented a numerical subgrid resolution approach for solving the Stokes-Brinkman system of equations for various scientific and industrial problems. B.K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%