2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a new method of estimating shear wave velocity from conventional well logs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the prediction accuracy of HFEN is higher than that of random forest. In addition, the prediction results of the proposed method also show advantages compared with similar studies (Wang and Peng, 2019;Wang et al, 2021;Mehrad et al, 2022). Compared to a previous study regarding the JSO field (Song, et al, 2021), HFEN provides results that are closer to actual measurements with lower errors which prove that the network is effective.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Hybrid Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The results show that the prediction accuracy of HFEN is higher than that of random forest. In addition, the prediction results of the proposed method also show advantages compared with similar studies (Wang and Peng, 2019;Wang et al, 2021;Mehrad et al, 2022). Compared to a previous study regarding the JSO field (Song, et al, 2021), HFEN provides results that are closer to actual measurements with lower errors which prove that the network is effective.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Hybrid Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The prevalent deep learning algorithms in geophysics are recurrent neural networks (RNNs) for sequence data and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image recognition, which are commonly used for micro-seismic monitoring, seismic first break pick, and oil flow rates prediction (Yuan et al, 2018;Abad et al, 2021;, etc. Logging curves are typical of depth sequence data, so many scholars have introduced RNNs and their variants Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks into Swave velocity prediction (Sun and Liu, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Wang and Cao, 2021;You et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022) feature extraction, so S-wave velocity prediction based on CNN has been widely applied in recent years (Wang and Peng, 2019;Zhang et al, 2021), but it is necessary to mention that CNNs can only extract local features and appear to be powerless for features of long sequences of logging curves. RNNs can only indirectly obtain the information of the previous sequence using hidden states, and since the dimension of the hidden states must be much smaller than the connected dimension of all samples of the previous sequence, this approach will inevitably lose some information, leading to the problem of exploding or vanishing gradients (Bengio et al, 1994;Chen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models excel in complex function approximation and layer-wise feature transformations, making them a compelling choice in the field. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), renowned for their ability to capture spatial features, have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse geophysical domains, including well-logging data interpretation [13], seismic interpretation [14], and seismic inversion [15,16]. Because Wang et al (2020) leveraged the long-term correlation patterns observed in well-logging data, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network emerged as a viable choice for shear wave velocity prediction and the identification of complex reservoir geophysical parameters [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%