1992
DOI: 10.1155/s1048953392000200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a multilevel controlled bulk queueing system MX/Gr,R/1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result represents a speciM case of M/G,n/1 sudied in Abolnikov/Dshalalow [2], where in our case the modNagion and sate dependency is dropped. (For details see the notion of modulation in [2] or our notice on modulation briefly mentioned ag the end of section 3).…”
Section: Model 2 ( Rsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result represents a speciM case of M/G,n/1 sudied in Abolnikov/Dshalalow [2], where in our case the modNagion and sate dependency is dropped. (For details see the notion of modulation in [2] or our notice on modulation briefly mentioned ag the end of section 3).…”
Section: Model 2 ( Rsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…With the sasne argument as that presented in Model 1, we have that Note that in the case of where the start-up time requirement is dropped, and r = N, the probability generating function P(z) for Model 3 coincides wih gha of the model developed by Abolnikov mad Dshalalow [2]. 6.…”
Section: Model 2 ( Rmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Customer arrive service facilities with poison process and exponential service time distribution. Abolnikov et al [8] threw the light on the study a class of bulk queueing systems with a compound Poisson input modulated by semi-Markov process, multilevel control service time and queue length dependent, service delay discipline. Pang and Whitt [9] were motivated by large-scale service systems, and considered an infinite-server queue with batch arrivals, where the service times are dependent within each batch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%