2013 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies 2013
DOI: 10.1109/csnt.2013.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Mobile Agent Framework for an Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Architectures and use cases for IoT systems, that utilize software agents, have been presented in [2,3,7,16,17,19,23,24,27,29,33,47,51,61,64,71]. As presented, an agent-based IoT architecture is multilayered, where the agents operate on different roles on each layer for the management, control, coordination and organization of system components and to connect components into the system.…”
Section: Edge Computing With Mobile Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Architectures and use cases for IoT systems, that utilize software agents, have been presented in [2,3,7,16,17,19,23,24,27,29,33,47,51,61,64,71]. As presented, an agent-based IoT architecture is multilayered, where the agents operate on different roles on each layer for the management, control, coordination and organization of system components and to connect components into the system.…”
Section: Edge Computing With Mobile Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Godfrey et al [30] propose a mobile agent framework to achieve communication between heterogeneous devices, search for resources and provide services to devices in the network. The mobile agent is either runs on a dedicated node or computer connected to the network, or embedded in the device itself.…”
Section: Agent-based Iot Architectures and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Message broadcasting drastically increases the communication cost [Wu et al 2015] and can clutter a network. In the proposed mechanism, we have used a conscientious agent migration strategy [Minar et al 1999] which has least inter-node communication cost [Godfrey et al 2013] as compared to other agent based approaches such as CLInG [Sempe and Drogoul 2003], EVAP [Chu et al 2007] and Random-walk with cloning [Gaber and Bakhouya 2008]. 2) Synchronization in distributed settings is a major challenge and is traditionally achieved by using a single node (or a subset of nodes) which provide for clocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%