1965
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9163(65)91127-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a method to correct for particle number fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the first three terms are the BeS ground state energy, and the last 29,30 term approximately accounts for the fixed-particle-numher correction.…”
Section: Pairing Spring Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the first three terms are the BeS ground state energy, and the last 29,30 term approximately accounts for the fixed-particle-numher correction.…”
Section: Pairing Spring Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where EA=, is the total energy calculated without pairing (Nilsson-Strutinsky model with the spherical A = 146parameters [SI) and Ep& is the pairing energy (monopole BCS with blocking and an approximate particle number projection [6]). The total spin is identified with the sum of the quasiparticle's spin components along the symmetry axis [7].…”
Section: Pairing and Quadrupole Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] A more straightforward technique, first validated by the studies of Kerman et al, 4 has been to project particleconserving wave functions from the original BCS func tion and to use the former for the evaluation of all observables. 13 ' 14 Finally, we may mention some rather more elaborate efforts to construct wave functions for ground and exicted states, 15 * 16 including a method for obtaining exact solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%