2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2016.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a limit of the method of Tashkinov trees for edge-colouring

Abstract: The main technique used to edge-colour graphs requiring ∆ + 2 or more colours is the method of Tashkinov trees. We present a specific limit to this method, in terms of Kempe changes. We also provide a new Tashkinov tree extension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Therefore w i cannot be the supporting vertex of T it with respect to ϕ it and connecting color δ it (see Algorithm 3.1); this contradiction proves (2).…”
Section: Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Therefore w i cannot be the supporting vertex of T it with respect to ϕ it and connecting color δ it (see Algorithm 3.1); this contradiction proves (2).…”
Section: Auxiliary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As remarked by McDonald [23], the Goldberg-Seymour conjecture and ideas culminating in this method are two cornerstones in modern edge-coloring. Nevertheless, this method suffers some theoretical limitation when applied to prove the conjecture; the reader is referred to Asplund and McDonald [2] for detailed information. Despite various attempts to extend the Tashkinov trees (see, for instance, [3,4,5,31,36]), the difficulty encountered by the method remains unresolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , T p be components of G\S, with p > |S|, |T i | odd, and (G); this contradiction establishes (1). Thus Γ w (G) > ∆ w (G), contradicting the hypothesis of this theorem.…”
Section: Matchingsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…If |X| ≥ 3, then U k+1 = X is an optimal solution to (3.4) and hence to (3.3). (1) and 3, we see that (4) z(U, α k ) ≤ 0 for any U ⊆ V with |U | odd. Since z(U k , α k ) = 2w(U k ) − α k (|U k | − 1) = 0 by the definition of α k and |U k | ≥ 3, from (4) we deduce that U k+1 = U k is an optimal solution to (3.3).…”
Section: Algorithm 31 For Wdpmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation