2003
DOI: 10.3792/pjaa.79.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Lehmer problem concerning Euler's totient function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up till now no solution has been found and the lower bound has been pushed much higher. (A good discussion of this problem may be found in [4].) For this reason it is most likely that φ −1 (m) contains no n ≡ 1(mod m), when m + 1 is composite.…”
Section: Factorialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up till now no solution has been found and the lower bound has been pushed much higher. (A good discussion of this problem may be found in [4].) For this reason it is most likely that φ −1 (m) contains no n ≡ 1(mod m), when m + 1 is composite.…”
Section: Factorialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question remains still open (see, e.g., [3,Problem B37]); and (under the hypothesis L = ∅) the structure of L was studied in a number of papers (see [2,4,12] and the references given therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem has been studied by many mathematicians (we refer to [1][2][3][4][5] for some results on this topic), and up to now it is known that if any counterexample exists, then it must be bigger than 10 30 , and it must be Carmichael (and hence odd and square-free). We recall that a composite number n is called Carmichael if b n ≡ b (mod n)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%