2005
DOI: 10.1137/s0036141004444846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Hele--Shaw-Type Domain Evolution with Convected Surface Energy Density

Abstract: Interest is directed to a moving boundary problem with a gradient flow structure which generalizes surface-tension driven Hele-Shaw flow to the case of nonconstant surface tension coefficient taken along with the liquid particles at the boundary. In the case with kinetic undercooling regularization well-posedness of the resulting evolution problem in Sobolev scales is proved, including cases in which the surface tension coefficient degenerates. The problem is reformulated as a vector-valued, degenerate parabol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we prove our main result (Theorems 2.1 and 2.2) on short-time wellposedness of the moving boundary problem (1.1), (1.4), (1.5). We will omit certain details as they are parallel to the discussion in [10]. However, the right-hand side of the evolution problem obtained there is of order two.…”
Section: δϕ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) δψ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) ∂ N ψ(· T) = δ mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this way, we prove our main result (Theorems 2.1 and 2.2) on short-time wellposedness of the moving boundary problem (1.1), (1.4), (1.5). We will omit certain details as they are parallel to the discussion in [10]. However, the right-hand side of the evolution problem obtained there is of order two.…”
Section: δϕ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) δψ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) ∂ N ψ(· T) = δ mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For more details and references, see [1,7,10]. Kinetic undercooling regularization corresponds to adding in (1.3) a boundary integral term β Γ v 1 v 2 dΓ with β > 0, this case is discussed in [10].…”
Section: δϕ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) δψ(· T) = 0 In ω(T) ∂ N ψ(· T) = δ mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations