1964
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1964.14.969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a generalized Stieltjes trasform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the corresponding inversion function E(x), which serves to invert the transform is defined by the equation This conventional convolution has been extended a certain class of generalized functions [Zemanian,7, p.229-246] and their inversion formula has been proved to be still valid when the limiting operation in that formula is understood as weak convergence in the space D' of Schwartz distributions.Setting s = ex and t = e-t in the conventional generalized Laplace transform We obtain F(ex) =~~;~ 1-: e(x-t)l1 1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))j(e-t)e-tdt or ex F(ex) =~i;~ 1-: e(x-t)(/3+l)1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))f(e-t)dt or J(x) =~~;~ 1-: e(x-t)(/3+l)1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))j(t)dtwhere J(x) =ex F(ex) andj(t) = f(e-t).As in Joshi(5] and using some results from Hirschman and Widder(4] (p.66), the inversion operator E(D) is given by E(D){ ex F(ex)} = E(D){ J(x)} = lim (-lfna-{3+xe(n+{3)x Dne-(f3+ri+l)x Dne-ax D-ne(a+ri)x F( ex)where D1 = de"' •…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and the corresponding inversion function E(x), which serves to invert the transform is defined by the equation This conventional convolution has been extended a certain class of generalized functions [Zemanian,7, p.229-246] and their inversion formula has been proved to be still valid when the limiting operation in that formula is understood as weak convergence in the space D' of Schwartz distributions.Setting s = ex and t = e-t in the conventional generalized Laplace transform We obtain F(ex) =~~;~ 1-: e(x-t)l1 1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))j(e-t)e-tdt or ex F(ex) =~i;~ 1-: e(x-t)(/3+l)1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))f(e-t)dt or J(x) =~~;~ 1-: e(x-t)(/3+l)1F1 (A, B; -e(x-t))j(t)dtwhere J(x) =ex F(ex) andj(t) = f(e-t).As in Joshi(5] and using some results from Hirschman and Widder(4] (p.66), the inversion operator E(D) is given by E(D){ ex F(ex)} = E(D){ J(x)} = lim (-lfna-{3+xe(n+{3)x Dne-(f3+ri+l)x Dne-ax D-ne(a+ri)x F( ex)where D1 = de"' •…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The essential feature of finite-part integration is to give meaning to term by term integration that leads to divergent integrals. Consider the generalized Stieltjes transform [9,10,11] (1.1) F(ω) = a 0 f (x) (ω + x) ρ dx, Date: December 4, 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is first introduced in [1] and applied in [2] to obtain both an exact and asymptotic representations of the generalized Stieltjes transform of integral orders for small values of the real positive parameter ω. We will do the same to evaluate (1) and take the limit a → ∞ to obtain the corresponding result for the generalized Stieltjes transform of non-integer order [3,4,5,6,7]. The need for a separate treatment stems from the fact that the nature of the singularity of the complex valued function (ω + z) −λ depends on λ: when λ is an integer n, the integrand in (1) has a pole at z = −ω of order n; on the other hand, when λ is non-integer, the integrand has a branch point at z = −ω instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%