2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-008-0434-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a generalisation of a Lehmer problem

Abstract: We consider a generalisation of the classical Lehmer problem about the distribution of modular inverses in arithmetic progression, introduced by E. Alkan, F. Stan and A. Zaharescu. Using bounds for multiplicative character sums instead of bounds for Kloosterman sums traditionally applied to this kind of problem, we improve their results in several directions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For large values of h, one can use bounds of Kloosterman sums (for ν = 2, 3) and multiplicative character sums (for ν ≥ 4) to obtain various asymptotic formulas for J ν (p, h, s; λ), see [14,15,21,24,25]. However, this approach does not give any nontrivial estimates for small values of h, and thus Chan and Shparlinski [5], for ν = 2, have employed methods of additive combinatorics, namely some results of Bourgain [3], in order to obtain a nontrivial upper bound on J ν (p, h, s; λ) for any h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large values of h, one can use bounds of Kloosterman sums (for ν = 2, 3) and multiplicative character sums (for ν ≥ 4) to obtain various asymptotic formulas for J ν (p, h, s; λ), see [14,15,21,24,25]. However, this approach does not give any nontrivial estimates for small values of h, and thus Chan and Shparlinski [5], for ν = 2, have employed methods of additive combinatorics, namely some results of Bourgain [3], in order to obtain a nontrivial upper bound on J ν (p, h, s; λ) for any h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have mentioned the case of just one congruence (2) has been considered in [9,10], so we always assume that s ≥ 1 (and thus n ≥ 3). Let k = min{k i,j : i = 1, .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dimension s = 3 it is based on Theorem 16. For s 4 the proof is based on various bounds for multiplicative character sums in the same style as in [169,176].…”
Section: Visible Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%