2001
DOI: 10.1006/jeth.1999.2627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Class of Stable Random Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us recall the formulation of the one-sector growth model with a Cobb-Douglas production function G(x) = x , 0 < < 1, with a representative decision maker's utility given by u(c) = ln c. Suppose that an exogenous perturbation may reduce 6 production by some parameter 0 < k < 1 with probability p > 0 (the same for all t = 0; 1; : : :). This independent and identically distributed random shock enters multiplicatively into the production process so that output is given by G r (x) = rx where r 2 fk; 1g.…”
Section: One Sector Log-cobb-douglas Optimal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us recall the formulation of the one-sector growth model with a Cobb-Douglas production function G(x) = x , 0 < < 1, with a representative decision maker's utility given by u(c) = ln c. Suppose that an exogenous perturbation may reduce 6 production by some parameter 0 < k < 1 with probability p > 0 (the same for all t = 0; 1; : : :). This independent and identically distributed random shock enters multiplicatively into the production process so that output is given by G r (x) = rx where r 2 fk; 1g.…”
Section: One Sector Log-cobb-douglas Optimal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stochastic steady state is identi…ed as an invariant distribution, and, since the seminal papers by Lucas-Prescott [41] and Brock-Mirman [11], a large part of the literature on the subject has focused on the existence, uniqueness and global stability of this invariant distribution. See, for example, [44], [45], [10], [16], [28] and, more recently, [34], [6] and [57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is easy to see that [c,d] is invariant under F. Hence, for the long run analysis of the evolution of X n , we can take [c,d] as the effective state space. The splitting condition (H) is verified by a careful consideration of the structure of the model (Bhattacharya and Majumdar (2001). It should be stressed that while G is not a monotone function, on the (common) invariant interval [c,d] both F and G are monotone (increasing and decreasing respectively).…”
Section: Models Of Growth and Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This turns out to be crucial to derive the -consistency of the estimates. We also sketch in this section some applications of the results to example of growth and cycles under uncertainty [see Stokey and Lucas (1989), Ljungqvist and Sargent (2000) and Bhattacharya and Majumdar (2001)]. All the proofs are relegated to the last section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) it is independent of the set K and is onto; 2 Note that the no overlap condition (21) in this context is equivalent to the strong separation condition defined on p. 35 in [4].…”
Section: Definition 1 We Shall Say That a Set C ⊂ R Is A Generalized mentioning
confidence: 99%