2002
DOI: 10.1002/nav.10007.abs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a class of multiple failure mode systems

Abstract: The primary objective of this work is to introduce and perform a detailed study of a class of multistate reliability structures in which no ordering in the levels of components' performances is necessary. In particular, the present paper develops the basic theory (exact reliability formulae, reliability bounds, asymptotic results) that will make it feasible to investigate systems whose components are allowed to experience m ≥ 2 kinds of failure (failure modes) and their breakdown is described by different fami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 4 gives some closed form expressions as special cases. All the results presented in the section are, to the best of our knowledge, new and have potential applications to other problems such as statistical tests based on multiple run and a class of multiple failure mode reliability system (see Boutsikas and Koutras (2002)). In Section 5, numerical examples are given in order to illustrate the feasibility of our main results, which nowadays can be easily achieved by computer algebra systems.…”
Section: Kiyoshi Inoue and Sigeo Akimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Section 4 gives some closed form expressions as special cases. All the results presented in the section are, to the best of our knowledge, new and have potential applications to other problems such as statistical tests based on multiple run and a class of multiple failure mode reliability system (see Boutsikas and Koutras (2002)). In Section 5, numerical examples are given in order to illustrate the feasibility of our main results, which nowadays can be easily achieved by computer algebra systems.…”
Section: Kiyoshi Inoue and Sigeo Akimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Section 3.1.5, we discussed the recent unified approach of Balakrishnan et al in which the class of binary start‐up demonstration tests is studied under a very general framework by using the families of sets P and C . Here, we make use of the theory of multiple failure mode reliability systems to study the case of multistate start‐up tests under a similar unifying framework.…”
Section: Multistate Start‐up Demonstration Tests and Related Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, note also that the functions φ 0 ( Z ) and φ 1 ( Z ) are coordinate‐wise non‐decreasing functions defined on disjoint subsets of Δ. Thus, by using arguments similar to those of Theorem 2 of Boutsikas and Koutras , the following quite accurate upper bound can be derived: leftalignrightalign-oddPMathClass-open(X > nMathClass-close) ⩽ EMathClass-open[φ0MathClass-open(ZMathClass-open(nMathClass-close)MathClass-close)MathClass-close]EMathClass-open[φ1MathClass-open(ZMathClass-open(nMathClass-close)MathClass-close)MathClass-close]. align-even rightalign-label(34) Under the same assumptions, we can further bound the expectations E [ φ 0 ( Z ( n ))] and E [ φ 1 ( Z ( n ))] by leftalign-starrightalign-odd align-evenEMathClass-open[φ1MathClass-open(ZMathClass-open(nMathClass-close)MathClass-close)MathClass-close] jΔ0E k=1Mj 1 iPjkMathClass-open(1 ZjiMathClass-close) , rightalign-label align-labelrightalign-odd align-evenEMathClass-open[φ0MathClass-open(ZMathClass-open(nMathClass-close)MathClass-close)MathClass-close] jΔ1E k=1Nj…”
Section: Multistate Start‐up Demonstration Tests and Related Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We would like to mention a class of multiple failure mode (MFM) systems (see Chao et al (1995)). According to Boutsikas and Koutras (2002), the consecutive k 1 , k 2 , . .…”
Section: Overlap Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%