1965
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1965-0171275-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a certain numerical invariant of link types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
221
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(225 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) If α is the trivial representation, then Theorem 1.1 was proved in the one-variable case by Murasugi [Mu67] (cf. also [Ka77]) and in the multi-variable case it was proved independently by Kawauchi We prove a generalization of Milnor's classical duality theorem for Reidemeister torsion [Mi62] and use it as a key ingredient in the proof of the above sliceness obstruction.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) If α is the trivial representation, then Theorem 1.1 was proved in the one-variable case by Murasugi [Mu67] (cf. also [Ka77]) and in the multi-variable case it was proved independently by Kawauchi We prove a generalization of Milnor's classical duality theorem for Reidemeister torsion [Mi62] and use it as a key ingredient in the proof of the above sliceness obstruction.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the main theorem of this paper is of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1446788700026094 [9] On the Alexander polynomial 325…”
Section: Statement Of Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After collecting some knot and number theoretic preliminaries in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 resp., we begin in Section 3 with recalling a criterion for the Alexander polynomial of an achiral knot via the determinant, which follows from Murasugi's work on the signature [41] and the Lickorish-Millett [36] value of the Jones polynomial. These conditions show that, paradoxically formulated, although the Alexander polynomial cannot distinguish between a knot and its mirror image, it can still sometimes show that they are distinct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%