1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01790549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On 385-01385-01385-01regularity of the gradient of solutions of degenerate parabolic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The brilliant idea to use a certain intrinsic geometry which reflects the inhomogeneity of the parabolic system was invented by DiBenedetto & Friedman [12,13] who proved Hölder continuity of the spatial gradient of the solution in the interior of the domain. For the C 1,α -estimate we also refer to Wiegner [29]. In this setting everywhere regularity cannot be expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brilliant idea to use a certain intrinsic geometry which reflects the inhomogeneity of the parabolic system was invented by DiBenedetto & Friedman [12,13] who proved Hölder continuity of the spatial gradient of the solution in the interior of the domain. For the C 1,α -estimate we also refer to Wiegner [29]. In this setting everywhere regularity cannot be expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…case of problem 1.5 , existence and uniqueness of weak solutions under w x general initial data were proved in 24 . For the Holder continuity of w x solutions and their spatial gradients we refer to 22,23,52,21,42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter implies the Ho lder continuity. The proof is somewhat complicated but the ideas can be extended to some systems (see [29,30]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of using logarithmic function was originally employed by Moser and other authors ( [29,30]) in the aforementioned works to obtain auxiliary results but did not play a direct role to derive regularity results. In contrast, our proof makes use of these functions to get a simpler and straightforward proof compared to those of the methods mentioned above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%