2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2011.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On 3-connected minors of 3-connected matroids and graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, it is easy to verify that H ∼ = K 1,1 3,3 and conclude the lemma. The next result is Corollary 1.8 of [2]. So, there is e ∈ E (G) and X ⊆ E (G) such that G\X /e ∼ = K 1,1 3,3 .…”
Section: Proofs For the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Now, it is easy to verify that H ∼ = K 1,1 3,3 and conclude the lemma. The next result is Corollary 1.8 of [2]. So, there is e ∈ E (G) and X ⊆ E (G) such that G\X /e ∼ = K 1,1 3,3 .…”
Section: Proofs For the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…What can we say about their distribution?". In particular, we generalize the following theorem: [18](k = 1, 2) and Costalonga [4](k = 3)) Let k ∈ {1, 2, 3} and let M be a 3-connected matroid with a 3-connected simple minor N such that r (M) − r (N ) ≥ k. Then, M has a k-independent set of vertically N -contractible elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%