1979
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1979.80.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On 2-dimensionalCW-complexes with a single 2-cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite 2-complexes given in the proof of Theorem 9.6 are irreducible and so show that some further conditions must be imposed. This was shown to be true by Jajodia [27,Corollary 4] when the X i , Y i have a single 2-cell.…”
Section: By [31 Proposition 21]mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The finite 2-complexes given in the proof of Theorem 9.6 are irreducible and so show that some further conditions must be imposed. This was shown to be true by Jajodia [27,Corollary 4] when the X i , Y i have a single 2-cell.…”
Section: By [31 Proposition 21]mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, the complement of the Trefoil Knot, shown in Figure 23, admits a handle decomposition with one 0-handle, two 1-handles and one 2-handle; see [23], exercise 6.2.2. Note that 2-dimensional CW-complexes with a unique 2-cell are classified by their fundamental group, up to homotopy equivalence; see [27].…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is known is that if X is aspherical or if X has only one 2-cell (Jajodia [7]) then G(X) -AuU>,(A)), while Schellenberg [15] and Sieradski [18] have shown that G( X) may be a proper subgroup of Aut(7r,( A)) when ttx( X) is a noncyclic finite abelian group. Question 3.…”
Section: -S'(a)-s(a)-g(a)-mentioning
confidence: 99%