2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2003.14296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On $1$-bridge braids, satellite knots, the manifold $v2503$ and non-left-orderable surgeries and fillings

Zipei Nie

Abstract: We define the property (D) for nontrivial knots. We show that the fundamental group of the manifold obtained by Dehn surgery on a knot K with property (D) with slope p q ≥ 2g(K) − 1 is not left orderable. By making full use of the fixed point method, we prove that (1) nontrivial knots which are closures of positive 1-bridge braids have property (D); (2) L-space satellite knots, with positive 1-bridge braid patterns, and companion with property (D), have property (D); (3) the fundamental group of the manifold o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And as its name suggests, any lens space is an L-space. It is also proved that any 1-bridge braid in the three-sphere or lens space is an L-space knot [9], and the L-spaces obtained by surgeries along 1-bridge braids in S 3 has non-left-orderable fundamental groups [17]. In line with these researches, we deduce similar properties of (1, 1) L-space knots in S 3 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…And as its name suggests, any lens space is an L-space. It is also proved that any 1-bridge braid in the three-sphere or lens space is an L-space knot [9], and the L-spaces obtained by surgeries along 1-bridge braids in S 3 has non-left-orderable fundamental groups [17]. In line with these researches, we deduce similar properties of (1, 1) L-space knots in S 3 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In this paper, we prove the following result in a similar way. Thanks to the additional symmetry, our proof is simplified compared to the proof of [17,Theorem 1.3]. Therefore, by [17,Theorem 4.1], we have the following conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If o is a left-order on π 1 (U 0 ) with dynamic realisation ρ o : π 1 (U 0 ) → Homeo + (R), [Nie,Lemma 6.1] shows that ρ o (π 1 (∂U 0 )) has no fixed points in R. It follows from Lemma 6.5 that o is boundary-cofinal and that we can assume that ρ o (π 1 (∂U 0 )) ≤ Homeo Z (R). Lemma 6.7 then shows that o order-detects a slope.…”
Section: Rmentioning
confidence: 99%