2018
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omitting cytogenetic assessment from routine treatment response monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia is safe

Abstract: We conclude that it is safe to omit routine cytogenetics for response assessment during treatment and to only use molecular monitoring, in order to prevent ambiguous classifications, reduce costs, and reduce the need for invasive bone marrow sampling. Cytogenetic re-assessment should still be performed when molecular response is suboptimal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of molecular techniques to quantify the BCR-ABL1 transcript has become increasingly important, while the use of cytogenetic analyses diminished, as these are less sensitive and insufficiently informative. 1 Current European Leukemia Net (ELN) recommendations regarding response monitoring after first or second line TKI treatment rely primarily on the molecular response (MR), setting milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months based on welldefined BCR-ABL1 values with or without additional cytogenetics. 2 As TKI therapy does not fully eradicate the leukemic clone, it was initially thought that treatment would need to be continued indefinitely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of molecular techniques to quantify the BCR-ABL1 transcript has become increasingly important, while the use of cytogenetic analyses diminished, as these are less sensitive and insufficiently informative. 1 Current European Leukemia Net (ELN) recommendations regarding response monitoring after first or second line TKI treatment rely primarily on the molecular response (MR), setting milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months based on welldefined BCR-ABL1 values with or without additional cytogenetics. 2 As TKI therapy does not fully eradicate the leukemic clone, it was initially thought that treatment would need to be continued indefinitely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the advent of targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) changed drastically with markedly improved prognosis and many patients achieving deep molecular remissions. The role of molecular techniques to quantify the BCR‐ABL1 transcript has become increasingly important, while the use of cytogenetic analyses diminished, as these are less sensitive and insufficiently informative 1 . Current European Leukemia Net (ELN) recommendations regarding response monitoring after first or second line TKI treatment rely primarily on the molecular response (MR), setting milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months based on well‐defined BCR‐ABL1 values with or without additional cytogenetics 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The achievement of a complete cytogenetic response and/or a BCR-ABL1-value <1%IS or a two log reduction (CCyR/MR2.0) were pooled in the timeto-response analysis since they represent an equivalent disease burden. 6 However, in the main CICR analysis, patients without standardized (IS) molecular results were excluded. A Fine & Gray competing risks (CR) regression model was used for multivariable analysis including sex, age, EUTOS long term survival score (ELTS), leukocyte count at diagnosis and first-line TKI generation as covariates.…”
Section: The Use Of Hydroxyurea Pretreatment In Chronic Myeloid Leuke...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, bone marrow examination has formed a key component of evaluating response in CP CML, and has been performed until achievement of a CCyR. However, given that a 2-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcript levels roughly equates to a CCyR, many centres have moved towards only performing bone marrow cytogenetics after initial diagnosis in the setting of suspected treatment failure [30,63,64].…”
Section: Response Monitoring and Milestonesmentioning
confidence: 99%