2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12919-016-0008-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omics-squared: human genomic, transcriptomic and phenotypic data for genetic analysis workshop 19

Abstract: BackgroundThe Genetic Analysis Workshops (GAW) are a forum for development, testing, and comparison of statistical genetic methods and software. Each contribution to the workshop includes an application to a specified data set. Here we describe the data distributed for GAW19, which focused on analysis of human genomic and transcriptomic data.MethodsGAW19 data were donated by the T2D-GENES Consortium and the San Antonio Family Heart Study and included whole genome and exome sequences for odd-numbered autosomes,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results on sensitivity to phase 1 sampling variation suggest that the extreme and combined allocations are less sensitive to sampling variation, mainly because of the enrichment of the strata of interest that leads to sampling of most (or all) of the subjects in those categories (Appendix C supplementary material). Generating values for the multivariate model used for SBP were provided by GAW19 data simulators (Blangero et al, 2016). Sampling fractions are in percentages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results on sensitivity to phase 1 sampling variation suggest that the extreme and combined allocations are less sensitive to sampling variation, mainly because of the enrichment of the strata of interest that leads to sampling of most (or all) of the subjects in those categories (Appendix C supplementary material). Generating values for the multivariate model used for SBP were provided by GAW19 data simulators (Blangero et al, 2016). Sampling fractions are in percentages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family data set of the GAW 19 contains information on 157 unrelated individuals from the San Antonio family studies pedigrees, including systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) measurements, information regarding current use of antihypertensive medication, and non-genetic covariates (sex, age, and current tobacco smoking status) at one or more examination time points [4]. GE measurements in lymphocytes at the first time point are available for 20,634 transcripts, which were already quality-checked, filtered for detectable expression, and quantile-normalized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an application of the proposed approach and to illustrate how its result can lead to different conclusions compared to traditional approaches, we performed a genetic association analysis of the GAW19 data (Blangero et al, 2016). The data contains whole genome-sequence data, gene expression in lymphocytes measured with microarrays, blood pressure phenotypes, as well as nongenetic covariates from the T2D-GENES Consortium.…”
Section: Application To Genetic Analysis Workhop 19 Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we compare CIEE in the simulation study with the traditional multiple regression methods (MR and RR), the SEM method (Rosseel, ), and the sequential G‐estimation methods (Lipman et al., ; Vansteelandt et al., ). Finally, in an application to the Genetic Analysis Workshop 19 (GAW19) dataset (Blangero et al., ), we estimate and test direct effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on blood pressure accounting for intermediate gene expression phenotypes and available covariates using CIEE and MR, and discuss the different results obtained. An R package with the implementation of CIEE is publicly available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/CIEE/.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%