2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.11.22273694
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omicron neutralizing antibody response following booster vaccination compared with breakthrough infection

Abstract: The rapid spread of the vaccine-resistant Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 presents a renewed threat to both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals, and accelerated booster vaccination campaigns are underway to mitigate the ongoing wave of Omicron cases. The degree of immunity provided by standard vaccine regimens, boosted regimens, and immune responses elicited by the combination of vaccination and natural infection remain incompletely understood. The relative magnitude, quality and durability of serologi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, both younger and older adults who experienced their first SARS-CoV-2 infection (presumably Omicron BA.1 or BA.2 [12]) after three-dose vaccination demonstrated superior binding and functional humoral responses to those induced by triple-vaccination alone. This is consistent with other studies of hybrid immunity [10, 14, 15] and suggests that a post-third-dose infection may provide prolonged immune protection. The observation that immune enhancement was most pronounced for Omicron-specific responses ( e.g .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…By contrast, both younger and older adults who experienced their first SARS-CoV-2 infection (presumably Omicron BA.1 or BA.2 [12]) after three-dose vaccination demonstrated superior binding and functional humoral responses to those induced by triple-vaccination alone. This is consistent with other studies of hybrid immunity [10, 14, 15] and suggests that a post-third-dose infection may provide prolonged immune protection. The observation that immune enhancement was most pronounced for Omicron-specific responses ( e.g .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The observation that average humoral responses to three-dose vaccination failed to protect the participant against Omicron BA.1 infection is consistent with the extremely high rates of community transmission observed in many regions during recent Omicron-driven pandemic waves. Given that third vaccine doses substantially boost humoral responses in individuals of all ages ( 30 33 ), the relative risk of Omicron breakthrough infection is likely to be even higher among individuals who have received fewer than three doses ( 18 , 34 ). Relative risk is also likely to increase with time following vaccination due to natural declines in antibody responses ( 26 , 35 38 ), which, combined with natural Spike antigenic drift, may lead to ongoing risk of periodic re-infection ( 39 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we designed a bivalent vaccine, to address advanced models that attempt to define the antigenic range of SARS-CoV-2 (20) by selecting our Ancestor vaccine, SCB-2019, which occupies a centroid range of antigenicity and has shown high levels of efficacy against VOCs in a phase 3 trial (10), and the Omicron strain given its divergent antigenicity and its global prevalence. This approach is supported by the observation that individuals who have received two doses of Ancestor vaccine and subsequently infected with Omicron have high levels of broad cross-reactive neutralization against panels of VOCs (21). An Omicron only monovalent vaccine, while likely to elicit protection against Omicron and related sub-lineages, is however potentially ineffective against other VOC distal from its antigenic position; a rationale for bivalency to mitigate this risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%