2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omicron mutations increase interdomain interactions and reduce epitope exposure in the SARS-CoV-2 spike

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the dynamics of the Omicron 𝑆 trimers were likely not affected by the 6𝑃 substitution, in line with the preserved immunogenicity of this construct (19). Therefore, our observed difference in 𝑅𝐵𝐷 state occupancy and dynamics between Omicron and Wuhan variants is likely due to the acquired mutations during SARS-CoV-2 evolution in the human population, as recently suggested by molecular dynamics simulations (45). Moreover, the higher population of closed states in Omicron would explain the lower multivalent binding to 𝐴𝐶𝐸2, as recently described (17).…”
Section: Real-time Conformational Dynamics Of 𝑅𝐵𝐷Ssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the dynamics of the Omicron 𝑆 trimers were likely not affected by the 6𝑃 substitution, in line with the preserved immunogenicity of this construct (19). Therefore, our observed difference in 𝑅𝐵𝐷 state occupancy and dynamics between Omicron and Wuhan variants is likely due to the acquired mutations during SARS-CoV-2 evolution in the human population, as recently suggested by molecular dynamics simulations (45). Moreover, the higher population of closed states in Omicron would explain the lower multivalent binding to 𝐴𝐶𝐸2, as recently described (17).…”
Section: Real-time Conformational Dynamics Of 𝑅𝐵𝐷Ssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The advantage of this apparently neutral deal would be that an Omicron spike with lower probability of presenting 𝑅𝐵𝐷 open is less susceptible to be neutralized by antibodies binding to the 𝑅𝐵𝐷. Therefore, our results partly explain the high immune evasion of the Omicron spike (45,62).…”
Section: Conformational Selection Modelmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A notable difference observed between the Omicron BA.1 S protein compared to previous SARS-CoV-2 variants is its tighter interprotomer packing and more compact architecture. 10 , 32 , 38 , 39 , 41 Omicron BA.1 had 15 RBD mutations compared to the initial SARS-CoV-2 S protein ( Figure 1A ), The S371L, S373P, and S375F substitutions occur in an interfacial RBD loop, contributing, along with Y505H, to interactions between the down-state RBDs. The S373P substitution also shifts a short RBD helix, forcing a rotation of the N-linked glycan at N343 and allowing S371L (in BA.1) and S371F (in BA.2 and all later Omicron variants) to point toward the glycan to stabilize its new conformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most methods that tackle the problem of computing rates of rare transitions seek to generate a set of unbiased trajectories, either through combining direct sampling of many short trajectories from different starting points 13,14 as done in Markov State Modeling, through Monte Carlo in trajectory space as in Transition Path Sampling, 15 or by generating trajectories that progress in a particular coordinate as in Forward Flux Sampling, 16 Steered Transition Path Sampling, 17 Weighted Ensemble, 18 Transition Interface Sampling, 19 and Milestoning. 20 However, these methods are computationally expensive, and some scale poorly with system size, making them challenging to apply for the complex biophysical problems we are interested in studying, such as finding the time scale for protein−drug unbinding, 21 for the RBD opening of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, 22 or for the unbinding of cytoskeletal adhesion proteins under force. 23−25 As such, we are interested in approaches that build on CV biasing methods, which have been used to probe conformational transitions with sufficient computational efficiency even for relatively complex biological assemblies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%