Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004692.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
61
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(1 reference statement)
3
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, meta-analytic standardized mean differences for omega-3 fatty acids compared to placebo for depression generally range from 0.11 to 0.56 (Appleton et al 2015). However, interestingly, meta-analysis outcomes seem to depend on individual study characteristics: larger effects are seen for studies that supplement EPA to patients with major depressive disorder, as opposed to negligible or absent effect in studies that supplement DHA to subjects with only depressive symptoms or as preventive intervention (Martins 2009;Lin et al 2012;Martins et al 2012).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, meta-analytic standardized mean differences for omega-3 fatty acids compared to placebo for depression generally range from 0.11 to 0.56 (Appleton et al 2015). However, interestingly, meta-analysis outcomes seem to depend on individual study characteristics: larger effects are seen for studies that supplement EPA to patients with major depressive disorder, as opposed to negligible or absent effect in studies that supplement DHA to subjects with only depressive symptoms or as preventive intervention (Martins 2009;Lin et al 2012;Martins et al 2012).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Cochrane meta-analysis of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for depression observed an overall effect size of 0.30 (95%CI = 0.10-0.50) (Appleton et al 2015). However, the authors conclude that this significant small-to-modest effect size has small clinical significance because the approximate reduction in Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS)-score of 2.1 points remains under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)-limit of 3 points for clinically meaningful effects.…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four new meta-analyses [70][71][72][73] and 2 systematic reviews 69,74 have provided updates on the efficacy of o-3 fatty acids in MDD (Suppl . Table S7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table S7). One reported no benefits (13 trials, N ¼ 731), 70 another meta-analysis (25 trials, N ¼ 1438) 72 and 1 review 74 reported equivocal outcomes, 1 meta-analysis (15 trials, N ¼ 916) reported a positive outcome as monotherapy, 73 and 1 meta-analysis (11 trials, N ¼ 418) 69 and 1 review 71 reported a positive outcome as adjunctive therapy. Contradictory findings may be due to differences in study populations, methodology, and intervention parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%