2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-020-03191-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OMBM-ML: efficient memory bandwidth management for ensuring QoS and improving server utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the authors of [2] and [13] proposed a novel scheduling of scientific workflows, while in [19] QoS and cost optimization of cloud resource allocation is discussed. Sung et al [28] describe Optimized Memory Bandwidth Management Machine Learning to manage resources for latency-critical workloads and the authors of [1] describe an algorithm that evaluates resource utilization requirements for incoming tasks. Although this method does not require load prediction, the solution must know the incoming requests' resource demands, which may create a big disadvantage where load data are not well defined.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the authors of [2] and [13] proposed a novel scheduling of scientific workflows, while in [19] QoS and cost optimization of cloud resource allocation is discussed. Sung et al [28] describe Optimized Memory Bandwidth Management Machine Learning to manage resources for latency-critical workloads and the authors of [1] describe an algorithm that evaluates resource utilization requirements for incoming tasks. Although this method does not require load prediction, the solution must know the incoming requests' resource demands, which may create a big disadvantage where load data are not well defined.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is to pay attention to the specific characteristics of data patterns. Based on Incoming request [12] Online incremental learning X modelling [26] Learning automata X [8] Time-series with queuing theory X [31] Time-series analysis X X Real-life QoS data with artificially generated load data Incoming traffic as time series [20] RNNs and LSTM X Dataset from Afry, 30 minutes long forecast [27] Holt-Winters, ARIMA and LSTM X One-step forecasting Scheduling [14] Random Forest X incoming task to the [2,13] Scheduling of scientific workflows X available resources [19] QoS and cost optimization X [28] Optimized Memory Bandwidth Management Machine Learning X [1] Evaluation of resource utilization X Artificial intelligence [25] Autoscaling of network resources X techniques [10] RNNs X Dataset partially from PlanetLab [33] General framework for a VM reservation plan X Dataset from Wikipedia [16] Random Forest and ARIMA X Dataset from EMPRES-I [21] Multilayer Perceptron X Dataset from IPTV [32] Deep learning model X Dataset from PlanetLab [30] LSTM, Random Forest, linear regression and Gaussian process regression X QoS-driven resource [7] Incoming task analysis X Dataset from WSDream allocation [17] Incoming task analysis X [6] Iterative QoS prediction model X [29] Time series prediction X Dataset from Amazon and Google [22][23][24] Multi-stage optimization process with sophisticated data-cleaning, monitoring and scaling mechanisms…”
Section: Preliminary Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e study focuses only on the IP traffic network and does not mention specifically the application of ML to the enhancement of the QoS of IoT devices. Furthermore, many studies have discussed the use of ML techniques to enhance the QoS, such as [163][164][165][166][167][168].…”
Section: For Enhanced Qos In Iot Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%