2000
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200006001-00316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omapatrilat Compared With Lisinopril in Treatment of Hypertension as Assessed by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13,25 Preliminary investigations conducted with omapatrilat have shown that this compound effectively lowers blood pressure. 12,13 In accordance with these observations, we found that even though the study was conducted in normotensive subjects, both doses of omapatrilat lowered blood pressure, and the effect of the 80 mg dose was significantly greater than that obtained with the FOS/HCTZ combination. The fall in blood pressure induced by omapatrilat was dose-dependent and persisted during repeated administration.…”
Section: Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,13,25 Preliminary investigations conducted with omapatrilat have shown that this compound effectively lowers blood pressure. 12,13 In accordance with these observations, we found that even though the study was conducted in normotensive subjects, both doses of omapatrilat lowered blood pressure, and the effect of the 80 mg dose was significantly greater than that obtained with the FOS/HCTZ combination. The fall in blood pressure induced by omapatrilat was dose-dependent and persisted during repeated administration.…”
Section: Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Thus, omapatrilat simultaneously decreases angiotensin II generation by inhibiting ACE activity and reduces the metabolic degradation of natriuretic peptides by inhibiting NEP. In experimental hypertension, omapatrilat has been found to lower blood pressure in low-, normal-, and high-renin hypertension models, 10,11 and in humans, preliminary dose-finding studies have shown that omapatrilat reduces blood pressure dose-dependently at doses ranging between 5 and 80 mg. 12,13 Experimental and preliminary clinical studies also suggest that omapatrilat has favorable effects in heart failure. 10,14,15 Because of its ability to inhibit angiotensin II generation and to prevent the degradation of natriuretic peptides, oma-patrilat is expected to have a major impact on renal function, particularly on sodium excretion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models, NEP inhibition may have additional beneficial effects on target organs damage beyond ACE inhibition (5)(6)(7)(8). Omapatrilat was shown to have a greater antihypertensive efficacy in hypertensive patients than ACE inhibitors, such as lisinopril (9,10) or enalapril (11). Vasopeptidase inhibition could have an advantage over selective ACE inhibition for the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to either GW665011X or placebo (1:1 ratio) treatment in a double-blind manner. Patients in the active treatment group received two consecutive 3-day dose titration periods of GW660511X 50 mg once daily (days 1-3) and then 100 mg once daily (days 4-6) followed by GW660511X 200 mg once daily for 14 days (days [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Patients in the placebo treatment group received the same dosing regimen with a matched placebo.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Clinical evidence thus far has shown that omapatrilat, sampatrilat and fasidotril are effective in the management of hypertension in different patient populations. [9][10][11][12][13][14] However, adverse events (AE) associated with omapatrilat, especially angioedema, raised a concern for the safety of vasopeptidase inhibitors. 15 GW660511X is a novel potent and selective dual inhibitor of ACE (IC 50 3.2 nM) and NEP (IC 50 1.8 nM) both in vitro and ex vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%