Olive pomace based lightweight concrete, an experimental approach and contribution

Abstract

Due to conventional aggregates resources depletion, material recycling has become an economic and ecologic alternative. In this paper, locally available natural residues such as olive pomace were investigated, when partially incorporated in the concrete formulation, since the mechanical characteristics of lightweight aggregate concrete strongly depend on its properties and proportions. Lightweight aggregates are more deformable than the cement matrix because of their high porosity, and their influence on the concrete strength remains complex. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aggregates properties on lightweight concrete mechanical behaviour through an experimental approach. In addition, the different substitution sequences and the W/C ratio on lightweight concrete behaviour were evaluated, in order to determine the W/C ratio influence on the improvement of the lightweight concrete mechanical properties while knowing that the mixing water quantity gives the cement paste manoeuvrability and mechanical strength effects. The last part of this paper, therefore, was to provide statistical survey for estimating strength and weight reduction through the different natural aggregate substitutions to improve the lightweight concrete properties. The results achieved in a significant olive-pomace lower adhesion with the matrix after the cement setting, making the lightweight concrete mechanical strength weak. However, this work can open several perspectives: Results modeling and correlation with an experimental approach, the evolution and determination of lightweight concrete characteristics when exposed to high temperatures and thermohydric properties.

Analysis of Specific Greenhouse Gas Emissions Savings from Biogas Production Based on Agricultural Residues and Industrial By-Products

“…Grape pressings 0.525 [26] 150 [24] 52.5 [24] Tomato pomace 0.73 [27] 94 [28] 53 [29] Brewers' spent grain 0.45 [30] 89 [31] 62 [31] Olive pomace 0.9 [32] 121 [33] 71 [33] Sugar beet pulp 0.561 96 [34] 50 [34] It is important to highlight that for feedstocks with a bulk density greater than 0.75 t/m 3 , the feedstock load was constrained by weight, while for bulk densities less than 0.75 t/m 3 , it was volume constrained. The bulk density of agricultural residues could be increased 8-12 times at different bailing/briquetting process parameters [25].…”