1988
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(88)90160-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olive mills wastewater treatment by combined membrane processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the small pore size, severe fouling of the membrane occurs, which affects performance. To achieve a better performance, the ultrafiltration process is combined with centrifugation where COD removal efficiency up to 90% has been reported (Turano et al 2002), or with advanced oxidation process (Gernjak et al 2004;Drouiche et al 2004) or with reverse osmosis where it is possible to obtain a COD reduction of about 99% (Canepa et al 1988). …”
Section: Flocculation-clarificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the small pore size, severe fouling of the membrane occurs, which affects performance. To achieve a better performance, the ultrafiltration process is combined with centrifugation where COD removal efficiency up to 90% has been reported (Turano et al 2002), or with advanced oxidation process (Gernjak et al 2004;Drouiche et al 2004) or with reverse osmosis where it is possible to obtain a COD reduction of about 99% (Canepa et al 1988). …”
Section: Flocculation-clarificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the eldest publication which is treated in this study Canepa et al (1988) described a preliminary ultra-filtration of the raw wastewater to reduce the COD. The UF pilot unit was made of four multiple modules in series with three tubular membranes each for a total surface area of 2 m² and was equipped with polysulfone membranes with a nominal cut-off of 20 kDa.…”
Section: Cod Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the pretreatment for COD reduction Canepa et al (1988) described a combination of RO and adsorbing on porous polymers for the phenol recovery. The adsorbing step showed good retention qualities for polyphenols, but is not noted in detail at this point.…”
Section: Recovery Of Phenolic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canepa et al [21] used a resin-bed column for the inal puriication of OMW-3 previously treated by UF, and performed good regarding the retention of polyphenols, and could treat around 3000 L until saturation.…”
Section: Adsorption Processes For Olive Mill Eluent Puriicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canepa et al [21] conducted a study on OMW-3 (average COD = 90 g/L) treatment based on a combined UF membrane followed by adsorption and RO process at pilot scale. The UF membrane was made of polysulfone, the permeate was treated with adsorbing polymers, and the resins eluate with RO polypiperazine-amide membranes.…”
Section: Microiltration and Ultrailtration Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%