1989
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0711:oampoc>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oligocene and Miocene paleogeography of central California and displacement along the San Andreas fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, constraints from drill core cuttings and geophysical measurements around the San Andreas Fault show that a damage zone thickness of 250-300 m is possible around frictionally weak faults [Bradbury et al, 2007], considerably greater than our estimates for the décollement at the JFAST site (Figure 6a). However, the displacement on the San Andreas is~320 km [Graham et al, 1989], 2 orders of magnitude more than the estimated displacement for the footwall at the JFAST site. This suggests that any effect of friction on damage zone characteristics may only be evident for small displacement faults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, constraints from drill core cuttings and geophysical measurements around the San Andreas Fault show that a damage zone thickness of 250-300 m is possible around frictionally weak faults [Bradbury et al, 2007], considerably greater than our estimates for the décollement at the JFAST site (Figure 6a). However, the displacement on the San Andreas is~320 km [Graham et al, 1989], 2 orders of magnitude more than the estimated displacement for the footwall at the JFAST site. This suggests that any effect of friction on damage zone characteristics may only be evident for small displacement faults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The same early Miocene features that limit late Miocene strike slip in the region apply to proposed early Miocene strike slip [Smith, 1977;Powell, 1981a;Powell and Weldon, 1992, Matti and Morton, in press] on this fault as well. About 100 krn of right slip documented on the central San Andreas fault between 20-17 and 12-13 Ma [Graham et al, 1989;Powell and Weldon, 1992 These changes in the geometry of the rocks NE of the San Andreas fault will have a significant impact on reconstnlctions across the San Andreas system. As an example, the sketch in Figure 12 indicates how the San Gabriel-Liebre Mountain block can be restored along this boundary to match rock units both north and south of the Clemens Well fault without major strike slip on this fault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Chocolate Mountains and Oroeopia Mountains, the volcanic rocks are complexly deformed by NW-trending folds, and faults in a variety of orientations ['Dillon, 1975;Crowell, 1975]. Day and Sims, 1986;Graham et al, 1989;Powell and Weldon, 1992]. Powell and Weldon [1992] Powell and Weldon, 1992, p. 446].…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are aware of the already complex and confusing terrane nomenclature of the California Coast Ranges, and thus the danger of introducing yet another set of names for tectonic blocks in this region. However, we believe that this tectonic classification is a simplifying one -it is based on the observation that most of the separate blocks of the Coast Ranges were locked together possibly by the latest Cretaceous or during the Early Cenozoic, and the 'out-of-place' nature of these rocks is fundamentally related to the San Andreas fault system (Graham et al 1989), not cryptic and/or poorly defined pre-Cenozoic structures. The Monterey terrane was translated 310-350 km to the north by the San Andreas fault with respect to its origin in southern California (Page et al 1998).…”
Section: Geotectonic Background and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%