1976
DOI: 10.1037/h0077266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory recognition of conspecifics by domestic Norway rats.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carr et al, 1976). Social discrimination in rats is regulated by the presence of olfactory cues (e.g.…”
Section: The Social Recognition Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carr et al, 1976). Social discrimination in rats is regulated by the presence of olfactory cues (e.g.…”
Section: The Social Recognition Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social discrimination in rats is regulated by the presence of olfactory cues (e.g. Sawyer et al, 1984), and investigation therefore takes the form of sniffing of the social stimulus, particularly focusing on the ano-genital region (Carr et al, 1976). The test is based upon a comparison of behaviour, particularly investigation, between two exposures of the same individual to a subject animal, separated by an inter-exposure interval (IEI).…”
Section: The Social Recognition Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances they will investigate a novel conspecific more than a familiar one since they are already acquainted with the odour cues of the latter rather than the former [14]. Odour cues such as soiled bedding or urine from familiar animals are sufficient for the recognition process [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this study provides further evidence that if odour cues alone are used as social stimuli, rather than conspecifics, then discrimination is still possible by subject rats (e.g. Carr et al 1976;Sawyer et al 1984;Gheusi et al 1997) whilst ensuring that any potential aggression between individuals is avoided. The use of odour cues in the habituation/discrimination procedure (e.g.…”
Section: And Klein 1994)mentioning
confidence: 80%