2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-018-1273-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory navigation versus olfactory activation: a controversy revisited

Abstract: In the early 1970s, Floriano Papi and colleagues proposed the olfactory-navigation hypothesis, which explains the homing ability of pigeons by the existence of an odor-based map acquired through learning. This notion, although supported by some observations, has also generated considerable controversy since its inception. As an alternative, Paulo Jorge and colleagues formulated in 2009 the olfactory-activation hypothesis, which states that atmospheric odorants do not provide navigational information but, inste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As briefly mentioned above, the use by homing pigeons of a familiar visual landmark-based map for navigation was questioned by some authors. Importantly, whether or not unimpaired homing performances of anosmic pigeons from familiar sites are due to the use of familiar visual cues has important implication for the debate on olfactory navigation (Wiltschko 1996;Walcott et al 2018). The ability of anosmic pigeons to extract navigational information from a familiar landscape speaks against a nonspecific effect of anosmia treatment.…”
Section: Contribution Of Gps-tracking Data To Debated Questions On Olfactory Navigation In Homing Pigeonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As briefly mentioned above, the use by homing pigeons of a familiar visual landmark-based map for navigation was questioned by some authors. Importantly, whether or not unimpaired homing performances of anosmic pigeons from familiar sites are due to the use of familiar visual cues has important implication for the debate on olfactory navigation (Wiltschko 1996;Walcott et al 2018). The ability of anosmic pigeons to extract navigational information from a familiar landscape speaks against a nonspecific effect of anosmia treatment.…”
Section: Contribution Of Gps-tracking Data To Debated Questions On Olfactory Navigation In Homing Pigeonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of anosmic pigeons to extract navigational information from a familiar landscape speaks against a nonspecific effect of anosmia treatment. Perhaps more importantly, the impaired and unimpaired homing abilities of anosmic pigeons released at unfamiliar and familiar locations, respectively, suggest that the multi-cue navigational system proposed to explain pigeon navigation (Walcott 1996;Walcott et al 2018) is exclusively composed of olfactory and familiar visual landmarks (Gagliardo 2013).…”
Section: Contribution Of Gps-tracking Data To Debated Questions On Olfactory Navigation In Homing Pigeonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence that disrupting olfaction in birds impairs navigation performance. Whether these fi ndings provide compelling evidence for olfactory navigation is the subject of ongoing debate [14].…”
Section: Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in a recent paper looking at thalamic activation under different homing treatments, Jorge et al (2017), while still claiming an activational contribution from olfaction, also identify a direct role of olfaction in determining map-based position. Given, in my opinion, the overall untenable premise of the 'activational hypothesis', I continue to be amazed that it is arguably now the most debated issue regarding the sensory basis of the homing pigeon navigational map (see Walcott et al, 2018;Gagliardo et al, 2018).…”
Section: What Is Left To Understand?mentioning
confidence: 99%