2014
DOI: 10.1177/0333102414527014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory function in migraine both during and between attacks

Abstract: Introduction People with migraine often report being osmophobic, both during and between acute migraine attacks. It is not clear, however, whether such reports are associated with changes in olfaction such as hyperosmia, as measured by psychophysical testing. In this case-control study we quantitatively assessed olfactory identification ability, which correlates with threshold tests of olfactory acuity, in patients with migraine at baseline (no headache), during migraine episodes, and after a treated attack an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
4
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
29
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of ictal osmophobia also in patients with episodic forms of migraine in which CA is not present seems to reinforce this second physiological explanation. On the contrary, a recent work on episodic migraineurs [9] did not found differences between patients and controls in term of ''olfactory identification ability'', apparently in contrast with the hypothesis that the hypersensibility to olfactory stimulation may contribute to the sensitization process. In fact, this statement is not entirely true: the study was limited to episodic migraineurs and it did not separate osmophobic migraineurs from non-osmophobic neither clinically hyperosmic from non-hyperosmic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The presence of ictal osmophobia also in patients with episodic forms of migraine in which CA is not present seems to reinforce this second physiological explanation. On the contrary, a recent work on episodic migraineurs [9] did not found differences between patients and controls in term of ''olfactory identification ability'', apparently in contrast with the hypothesis that the hypersensibility to olfactory stimulation may contribute to the sensitization process. In fact, this statement is not entirely true: the study was limited to episodic migraineurs and it did not separate osmophobic migraineurs from non-osmophobic neither clinically hyperosmic from non-hyperosmic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…While around 20% of migraineurs have been reported to be anosmic or hyposmic (Hirsch, 1992), positron emission tomography (PET) studies show hypersensitivity to olfactory stimuli (Demarquay et al, 2008) with activations in a number of brain regions such as the temporal lobe, anterior cingulate, and locus coeruleus, but not the insula. Interictal olfactory hypersensitivity is reported (Marmura et al, 2014; Stankewitz and May, 2011) to be present in about 35% of migraineurs (Demarquay et al, 2006) and seems to be a predictor of olfactory triggers for migraine attacks. In addition, during a migraine attack some migraineurs have olfactory symptoms of microsmia or hyposmia (Marmura et al, 2014).…”
Section: The Functional Insula In Migrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interictal olfactory hypersensitivity is reported (Marmura et al, 2014; Stankewitz and May, 2011) to be present in about 35% of migraineurs (Demarquay et al, 2006) and seems to be a predictor of olfactory triggers for migraine attacks. In addition, during a migraine attack some migraineurs have olfactory symptoms of microsmia or hyposmia (Marmura et al, 2014). During spontaneous migraine attacks, there is increased activation induced by olfactory stimuli (rose odor) in the amygdala and insula (Stankewitz and May, 2011).…”
Section: The Functional Insula In Migrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently Marmura and colleagues reported impaired olfactory ability during migraine attacks in MwoA and MA patients as determined with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (28). While baseline olfaction did not differ from a healthy control group, UPSIT scores shortly after an attack were numerically lower than at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%