2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background The importance and prevalence of olfactory dysfunction is recently gaining attention in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a result of their chronic inflammatory disease, yet different prevalence rates are reported for it. Therefore, we have designed this systematic review to estimate the pooled prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in patients with MS. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in MS patients. Methods We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A TDI < 30.75 (defining hyposmia) was detected in 30.8% of the pwMS (26.5% of the patients with RRMS, 37.5% of those with PPMS, and 43.75% of those with SPMS). Our findings are corroborated by a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of 1099 MS cases which found that the pooled prevalence of olfactory dysfunction was 27.2% (95% CI: 19.7%, 35.4%) [ 29 ]. Compared to age- and sex-stratified updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data, 18.8% of the patients were found to be hyposmic (scores lower than the 10th percentile [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A TDI < 30.75 (defining hyposmia) was detected in 30.8% of the pwMS (26.5% of the patients with RRMS, 37.5% of those with PPMS, and 43.75% of those with SPMS). Our findings are corroborated by a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis of 1099 MS cases which found that the pooled prevalence of olfactory dysfunction was 27.2% (95% CI: 19.7%, 35.4%) [ 29 ]. Compared to age- and sex-stratified updated Sniffin’ Sticks normative data, 18.8% of the patients were found to be hyposmic (scores lower than the 10th percentile [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Existing data suggest that pwMS are at an elevated risk for experiencing olfactory impairment [ 2 , 29 ]. It is crucial to evaluate olfactory dysfunction as it affects the quality of life [ 2 , 30 ]; smell is related to a person’s physical, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive state, and also because there is growing evidence that the hyposmia in pwMS can be used as a potential disease marker [ 2 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Date received: 9 July 2022; revised: 14 July 2022; accepted: 14 July 2022 Dear Editor, Olfactory dysfunction has been studied in multiple sclerosis (MS). 1 We have recently read the paper by Bsteh et al, 2 stating that olfactory threshold (OT) predicts treatment response in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Absolute OT score (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.44, p < 0.001) and OT score improvement (HR = 0.12, p < 0.001) at 3 months after disease modifying treatment (DMT) initiation were associated with reduced relapse risk in the following 5 years.…”
Section: Olfactory Threshold As a Biomarker Of Disease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%