1980
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(80)90195-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory bulbectomy depresses ultrasound production and scent marking by female hamsters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferential marking toward male odors requires early experience with scents from male siblings (Maras and Petrulis, 2008a) similar to the development of odor preference in female mice (Moncho-Bogani et al, 2002). Not surprisingly, OBX greatly reduces vaginal marking toward males (Kairys et al, 1980). The MOS is the primary chemoreceptive system driving vaginal marking as VNO removal has minimal effect on vaginal marking whereas MOE destruction reduces the behavior (Johnston, 1992; Petrulis et al, 1999).…”
Section: Proceptive or Solicitation Behavior (Beach 1976)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preferential marking toward male odors requires early experience with scents from male siblings (Maras and Petrulis, 2008a) similar to the development of odor preference in female mice (Moncho-Bogani et al, 2002). Not surprisingly, OBX greatly reduces vaginal marking toward males (Kairys et al, 1980). The MOS is the primary chemoreceptive system driving vaginal marking as VNO removal has minimal effect on vaginal marking whereas MOE destruction reduces the behavior (Johnston, 1992; Petrulis et al, 1999).…”
Section: Proceptive or Solicitation Behavior (Beach 1976)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The USV response to male scents requires chemosensory input as OBX in females greatly reduced USVs toward males (Kairys et al, 1980) and removal of either VNO or MOE also substantially reduced USVs toward male odors (Johnston, 1992). The neural pathway controlling this response involves the MA (Kirn and Floody, 1985) and its connections to MPOA (Floody, 1989) with an inhibitory system originating in the lateral septum (Floody, 1993; Imondi and Floody, 1998; Kirn and Floody, 1985).…”
Section: Proceptive or Solicitation Behavior (Beach 1976)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that maintaining flank marking requires MOS input, but also that the AOS transmits information about same-sex odors to neural structures that generate flank marking. Indeed, combined damage to both systems, by removing MOB/AOB [47] or LOT transection [57,85], eliminates flank marking completely.…”
Section: Sexual Odor Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the behavior is regulated by odors it is not surprising that vaginal marking in response to male odors is greatly reduced by OB removal [47]. More selective damage to MOS, via peripheral ZnSO 4 lesions, produces decrements in vaginal marking but less than those following OB removal [38].…”
Section: Sexual Odor Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most mammalian species, including Syrian hamsters, chemosensory signals from conspecifics are initially detected and processed by two distinct but interconnected systems, the main and accessory olfactory systems (Keller et al, 2009). Disruption of inputs to the main (Johnston, 1992) or accessory (Petrulis et al, 1999) olfactory bulbs, or ablation of the olfactory bulbs themselves (Kairys et al, 1980), decreases vaginal marking to males or their odors. Sexual odor information is transmitted from the olfactory bulbs to areas throughout the ventral forebrain, including the medial amygdala (MA), the posterior division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), and the medial preoptic area (MPOA) (Coolen and Wood, 1998; Davis et al, 1978; Gomez and Newman, 1992; Wood and Swann, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%