2020
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory and gustatory function impairment in COVID‐19 patients: Italian objective multicenter‐study

Abstract: Background: Objective data on chemosensitive disorders during COVID-19 are lacking in the Literature.Methods: Multicenter cohort study that involved four Italian hospitals. Three hundred and forty-five COVID-19 patients underwent objective chemosensitive evaluation.Results: Chemosensitive disorders self-reported by 256 patients (74.2%) but the 30.1% of the 89 patients who did not report dysfunctions proved objectively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

30
299
6
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
30
299
6
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study chemosensitive dysfunction appeared in high percentage of the COVID-19 positive patients, 89.23% of patients had smell dysfunction and 83.08 had taste dysfunction. 2,6 Sudden Isolated chemosensitive dysfunction appeared in 18.46% and 15.38% for anosmia and taste loss respectively. Interestingly, that percentages were reported in patients who were tested because of only contact with COVID-19 relative; two of them reported the loss of smell as the rst symptom, while other 10 patients reported no rst complaint except contact with COVID -19 positive patient, and when it comes for the symptoms questionnaire, they had reported only chemosensitive dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study chemosensitive dysfunction appeared in high percentage of the COVID-19 positive patients, 89.23% of patients had smell dysfunction and 83.08 had taste dysfunction. 2,6 Sudden Isolated chemosensitive dysfunction appeared in 18.46% and 15.38% for anosmia and taste loss respectively. Interestingly, that percentages were reported in patients who were tested because of only contact with COVID-19 relative; two of them reported the loss of smell as the rst symptom, while other 10 patients reported no rst complaint except contact with COVID -19 positive patient, and when it comes for the symptoms questionnaire, they had reported only chemosensitive dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies reported this gender percentage. [5][6][7][8] Most cases were mild, followed by moderate, then total anosmia and or taste loss. There must recognition of the patient felling to have chemosensitive disorders and the real presence of such dysfunction, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The prevalence of OD may vary regarding the clinical setting, with rates of total loss of smell as high as 70% in patients with mild COVID-19 form. 2,4,5 The prevalence of OD in moderate-to-critical COVID-19 forms was poorly investigated. Moreover, there is, to date, a paucity of studies prospectively studying the recovery rates of smell sense in COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging studies based on objective evaluation of patients in fact suggest that there is no significant correlation between the prevalence of chemosensitive disorders and COVID-19 severity, supporting this proposal. [3][4][5] Furthermore, in our recent analysis of a series of 345 cases, patients with a duration of chemosensi- tive symptoms of >7 days had a 2.33-fold greater risk of developing severe symptoms. 5 We also demonstrated how anamnestic data collection underestimates the frequency of chemosensitive disorders detected in psychophysical tests, particularly in patients with a more serious presentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[3][4][5] Furthermore, in our recent analysis of a series of 345 cases, patients with a duration of chemosensi- tive symptoms of >7 days had a 2.33-fold greater risk of developing severe symptoms. 5 We also demonstrated how anamnestic data collection underestimates the frequency of chemosensitive disorders detected in psychophysical tests, particularly in patients with a more serious presentation. It seems likely that these patients have the same prevalence of chemosensitive dysfunction as patients with mild and moderate forms but neglect these symptoms while suffering with and receiving supportive treatment for severe respiratory disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%