Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Global Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis

Abstract

Objectives: Coronavirus illness (COVID-19) has been found to alter infected people’s sense of smell and taste. However, the pathobiology of this virus is not yet known. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the influence of COVID-19 infection on olfactory and gustatory processes. Therefore, we use bibliometric analysis on COVID-19 and olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction publications to provide studies perspective. Methods: A bibliometric literature search was performed in the Scopus database. The number and type of publications, countries for publications, institutional sources for publications, journals for publications, citation patterns, and funding agencies were analyzed using Microsoft Excel or VOSviewer. In addition, the VOSviewer 1.6.17 software was used to analyze and visualize hotspots and collaboration patterns between countries. Results: Scopus has published 187 088 documents for COVID-19 in all study fields at the time of data collection (July 26, 2021). A total of 1740 documents related to olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction were recovered. The countries most relevant by the number of publications were the United States (n = 362, 20.80%), Italy (n = 255, 14.66%), and the United Kingdom (n = 173, 9.94%). By analyzing the terms in the titles and abstracts, we identified 2 clusters related to olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction research, which are “diagnosis and test methods” and “prognosis and complications of the disease.” Conclusions: This is the first bibliometric analysis of publications related to COVID-19 and olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction. This study provides academics and researchers with useful information on the publishing patterns of the most influential publications on COVID-19 and olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction. Olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction as indices of suspicion for the empirical diagnosis of coronavirus infection is a new hotspot in this field.

Mapping the output of the global literature on the links between gut microbiota and COVID-19

“…More than 34,000 peer-reviewed academic journals can be found in Scopus, the world's largest and most comprehensive academic information source. First, we searched for terms associated with COVID-19 in article titles, abstracts, and author keywords [ 9 – 11 ]. The search was then restricted to publications using phrases relating to the microbiota [ 12 – 14 ].…”

Exploring the research landscape of COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction: A bibliometric study

“…However, despite these efforts, there have been only a limited number of comprehensive, quantitative analyses, and visualizations of COVID-19 related OD using bibliometrics. The data from these analyses were collected before 2021 (Hu et al, 2022;Zyoud et al, 2022), making it challenging to identify the most recent research directions in this field. To address this gap, this study will perform a comprehensive review and visualization of existing COVID-19 related OD research using a bibliometric approach.…”

Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls

“…This publication growth can be illustrated in a search of the PubMed database using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term, Bibliometrics, which retrieved nearly 13,000 publications distributed over 30 years in three 10year periods: 623 publications from 1991 to 2000; 3,677 from 2001 to 2010; and 8,641 from 2011 to 2020. Additionally, more recent bibliometric papers in the biomedical field range over numerous topics such as cancer (2, 3), radiology (4,5), and coronavirus (6,7). In this context, the objective of the utilization of bibliometrics varies from charting the growth and development of a research field (8); to evaluate the progress of a researcher (9), an institution (10), countries (11), or a journal (12); or to provide statistics to support science decisions, research policies and collaborative research initiatives (13).…”