1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199907)35:1<3::aid-dev2>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfactory alliesthesia in human neonates: Prandial state and stimulus familiarity modulate facial and autonomic responses to milk odors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Because previous research 15,23,24 has shown that negative facial configurations are more discriminating than positive configurations in gauging the infants' hedonic responsiveness, the videotape analyses focused on frequency of negative facial responses (eg, nose wrinkling, brow lowering, upper lip raising, gaping, head turning) made in response to each spoonful of cereal proffered. During scoring, the sound was turned off so that the raters would not be influenced by the infants' vocalizations.…”
Section: Of 6 Prenatal and Postnatal Flavor Learning By Human Infantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22 Because previous research 15,23,24 has shown that negative facial configurations are more discriminating than positive configurations in gauging the infants' hedonic responsiveness, the videotape analyses focused on frequency of negative facial responses (eg, nose wrinkling, brow lowering, upper lip raising, gaping, head turning) made in response to each spoonful of cereal proffered. During scoring, the sound was turned off so that the raters would not be influenced by the infants' vocalizations.…”
Section: Of 6 Prenatal and Postnatal Flavor Learning By Human Infantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The behavioral states were defined according to Prechtl's (1974) The mouthing movements were coded to provide an index of ''exploratory'' behavior (Desmond et al, 1963) and appetitive prefeeding responses (Bullinger & Rochat, 1985;Soussignan et al, 1999). The following oral items were coded: (1) Rooting, composed of repeated, short-range bilateral movements of the head with open mouth and often protruded lips (cf.…”
Section: Behavioural Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the infants' responses, the testing was run in preprandial state, that is, 3.3 AE 1.1 hr after the last feed, when they show maximal rooting-mouthing frequency to odors (Soussignan, Schaal, & Marlier, 1999). Observation sessions begun when the newborns were in calm or active waking states [States 3 or 4 of Prechtl's (1974) categories].…”
Section: Experimental Setting and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hedonicity is how we like or dislike a conscious experience. Hedonicity seems to be especially predominant with olfactory sensation (Royet, Zald, Versace, Coste, Lavenne, Koenig & Gervais, 2000;Soussignan & Schaal, 1996;Soussignan, Schaal & Marlier, 1999). What will be studied, therefore, is the capacity to remember stimuli as a function of the amount of pleasure or displeasure aroused by the stimuli -in our case, odors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The most important function of the nose may be not in transmitting messages about the outside world, but in motivating the organism after the message has been received" (Engen, 1973); that function being already present in the newborn (Marlier, Schaal &. Soussignan, 1997;Soussignan,,Schaal & Marlier, 1999) and even intra utero (Marlier Marlier, Schaal & Soussignan, 1998a, & 1998b. Animal experiments have shown that odors followed by a reward were better remembered than non-rewarded odors (Lovelace & Slotnick, 1995), which is a clue that memory privileges usefulness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%