“…Wang and Shultz's (2010) review of the literature on five corresponding theories on retirement as decision-making conceptualization is also used here and the results are illustrated in Table 1. These corresponding theories include rational choice theory (Hatcher, 2003;Gustman & Steinmeier, 1986;Quinn, Burkhauser, &Myers, 1990), image theory (Feldman, 1994;Beach &Frederickson, 1989), role theory (Talaga & Beehr, 1995;Ashforth, 2001;Moen, Dempster-McClain, & Williams, 1992;Brougham & Walsh, 2007), theory of planned behavior (Cron, Jackofsky, & Slocum, 1993;Ajzen, 1991;Adams & Beehr, 1998;Huuhtanen & Piispa, 1992;Shultz, Taylor, & Morrison, 2003;Wang, Zhan, Liu, & Shultz, 2008), and expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964;Kim, 2003;Belgrave & Haug, 1995;Cron, Jackofsky, & Slocum, 1993;DeVaney & Kim, 2003;Karpansalo, Manninen, Kauhanen, Lakka, & Salonen, 2004). Retirement decision-making is mostly involuntary, and the voluntariness of the retirement decision can be viewed as a boundary condition for applying an informed decision-making approach in testing predictors of the retirement decision (Gallo, Bradley, Siegel, & Kasl, 2000;Hanisch & Hulin, 1990;Shultz, Morton, & Weckerle (1998).…”