Older people's mental health in rural areas: Converting policy into service development, service access and a sustainable workforce

Abstract

This paper describes the older people's mental health workforce development, policy development and implementation process and quantifies the rural service delivery and access impacts over a 15‐year period in New South Wales. It highlights the factors that are considered to be critical to successful rural service development such as commitment to funding parity, investment in strong local service leadership, and development of innovative, locally adapted rural service models. Building on these foundations, the Older People's Mental Health Program in New South Wales was able to address key challenges relating to service access in rural health and develop new, sustainable specialist older people's mental health service networks. A sustained focus on policy and implementation which explicitly supports rural older people's mental health service enhancement, and development of evidence‐based models of care, has significantly improved access to specialist mental health care for older people in rural areas. It has delivered 23 new rural older people's mental health community teams and a 440% increase in the number of people accessing these teams. It has also doubled the number of acute inpatient units and established new specialist mental health‐residential aged care partnership services in rural New South Wales. It has resulted in increased access to services for the “older old,” while not diminishing older people's rates of access to general adult mental health services. It has also supported innovative, sustainable rural service models such as “hub and spoke” models and step‐up step‐down inpatient services that build on existing health and hospital infrastructure and link geographically dispersed specialist clinicians and services together in rural service delivery.

Is rural mental health workforce a policy imperative?

“…Future research could identify key and emerging themes in contemporary mental health policy and their implications for the future of the rural mental health workforce development. On the positive side, there are examples where rural mental health workforce issues have been addressed in a planned manner with good success . Future research should also identify and examine examples of successful implementation of rural workforce initiatives and models …”

Free speech costs: Public health policy and leadership matters

“…Policy based on research evidence and placed‐based expertise, implemented via persistent central leadership in partnership with local leadership and held together by good governance and communication processes, has proven to make a real difference in rural health 10 …”

A rural health governance model that is fit for purpose—It's not them and us: It's ‘we’

“…26 Another was a state-wide program to enhance older persons' services. 27 The common key features of these programs were as follows: locally controlled funding, centralagency engagement, mutual accountability and rigorous evaluation. Other shared characteristics of these programs were as follows: the inclusion of place-based experts, lived-experience experts, local leaders, clinicians and researchers working respectfully together to guide, monitor and manage the program.…”